Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandstorm (Transformers)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No quorum - NPASR. —Darkwind (talk) 04:49, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sandstorm (Transformers) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a collection of primary details without anything to establish notability. TTN (talk) 15:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:45, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sandstorm had a notable role in the Transformers mythos, and the article covers this fairly well. None of the other Triple Changer articles are nominated for deletion, so why single out Sandstorm? At the very least, merge or redirect to Triple Changer. JIP | Talk 19:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It needs reliable sources discussing it from a real world view in order to be considered notable. If it truly is important, information on the development of the character, reception to the character, and any real world impact involving the character should be available. If not, Wikia is a better place for the information. TTN (talk) 19:26, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Triple Changer. This belongs on Wikia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:46, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:32, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:29, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.